Talk to users before you build anything動手做之前,先跟使用者說話

What Paul Graham, The Mom Test and the Superhuman story teach about the cheapest research method there is: a real conversation.Paul Graham、The Mom Test 和 Superhuman 的故事,教你用最便宜的研究方法:一場真實的對話。

Orange gradient banner with a question bubble and an answer bubble, illustrating user interviews before building a product

The most expensive way to learn what people want is to build it first and find out after launch. The three sources below share a cheaper method: go have real conversations, and know how to listen.

Live in the future, then notice what is missing

Paul Graham argues the best startup ideas are noticed, not brainstormed. You put yourself among real users, watch what they struggle with, and the idea appears as a gap in their day. Talking to users is not validation theater; it is where the idea itself comes from.

Ask about their life, not your idea

The Mom Test’s rule is blunt: never pitch, and never ask “would you use this?” People lie to be polite. Ask what they did last week, what it cost them, what they tried before. Facts about the past are evidence; opinions about the future are noise.

Turn conversations into a number

Superhuman’s team asked users one question: how would you feel if you could no longer use the product? Tracking the share who answered “very disappointed” turned fuzzy feedback into a metric they could improve deliberately, segment by segment. Conversations scale when you score them.

What you need before your first ten interviews

  • A list of ten people who actually have the problem, with names
  • Five questions about their past behavior, zero questions about your idea
  • A promise to yourself: no pitching until the interview ends
  • One sentence after each call: what surprised you
  • A simple score you will track across conversations

The takeaway

  • Ideas come from noticing real gaps, so conversations are the source, not the checkpoint
  • Ask about past behavior; future opinions are polite lies
  • Score your conversations, and fuzzy feedback becomes a metric you can improve

想知道大家要什麼,最貴的方法就是先做出來、上線之後才發現。下面三個來源給出便宜得多的做法:去進行真實的對話,並且學會怎麼聽。

活在未來,然後注意少了什麼

Paul Graham 認為最好的新創點子是「注意到」的,不是腦力激盪出來的。把自己放到真實使用者中間,看他們卡在哪裡,點子會以「生活中的缺口」的形式自己出現。跟使用者說話不是驗證的儀式,點子本身就是從那裡來的。

問他的生活,不要問你的點子

The Mom Test 的規則很直接:不要推銷,也永遠不要問「你會用嗎?」人為了禮貌會說謊。要問他上週實際做了什麼、付出了什麼代價、之前試過哪些方法。關於過去的事實是證據,關於未來的意見是雜訊。

把對話變成一個數字

Superhuman 團隊只問使用者一題:如果再也不能用這個產品,你會多失望?追蹤回答「非常失望」的比例,把模糊的回饋變成一個可以分群、可以刻意改善的指標。對話一旦能計分,就能規模化。

前十場訪談之前,你需要準備的東西

  • 一份名單:十個真的有這個問題的人,要有名字
  • 五個關於他過去行為的問題,零個關於你點子的問題
  • 對自己的承諾:訪談結束前絕不推銷
  • 每場訪談後寫一句話:什麼讓你意外
  • 一個你會跨訪談持續追蹤的簡單分數

總結

  • 點子來自注意到真實的缺口,對話是源頭,不是驗收站
  • 只問過去的行為,關於未來的意見都是客氣話
  • 幫對話計分,模糊的回饋就變成可以改善的指標
All notes全部筆記
© 2026 ARTZY(群藝思)artzy.workMade in Taipei, Taiwan台北,台灣